Police say they believed soon after the caravan’s discovery in January that it was a ‘con job’, alleging it was fabricated by criminals for personal benefitThe discovery of a caravan packed with explosives earlier this year led to concerns about a possible terrorism attack, criticism of the police and media, and a fierce political debate about the federal government’s response to antisemitism.On Monday, Australian police said the caravan was part of “fake terrorism plot” allegedly orchestrated by organised criminals for personal gain. Continue reading…Police say they believed soon after the caravan’s discovery in January that it was a ‘con job’, alleging it was fabricated by criminals for personal benefitThe discovery of a caravan packed with explosives earlier this year led to concerns about a possible terrorism attack, criticism of the police and media, and a fierce political debate about the federal government’s response to antisemitism.On Monday, Australian police said the caravan was part of “fake terrorism plot” allegedly orchestrated by organised criminals for personal gain. Continue reading…
The discovery of a caravan packed with explosives earlier this year led to concerns about a possible terrorism attack, criticism of the police and media, and a fierce political debate about the federal government’s response to antisemitism.
On Monday, Australian police said the caravan was part of “fake terrorism plot” allegedly orchestrated by organised criminals for personal gain.
What do we know about who is behind it?
What happened at the time?
In January, a caravan containing explosives was discovered in Dural on the outskirts of Sydney. Inside the caravan were threats directed towards the Jewish community.
An investigation was launched by state and federal police, along with the domestic spy agency, given concerns the caravan could indicate a looming terrorist attack.
Ten days after the investigation was launched, the caravan’s existence was first revealed by the Daily Telegraph, prompting criticism of police for not immediately disclosing its discovery. That criticism has been rejected by senior police, who have alleged media reporting undermined its investigations. The newspaper’s crime editor said that criticism was “unfair” and that it would “never compromise an investigation”.
After the investigation became public, the Coalition accused the Albanese government of being too slow to request a briefing on the discovery. Senior Coalition figures accused the prime minister of being “out of his depth” on national security and antisemitisim.
What do we know now?
On Monday, the AFP said the caravan was “never going to cause a mass casualty event” and was a “fake terrorism plot”. It said there was no detonator inside the caravan.
The force’s deputy commissioner Krissy Barrett said this was known by police at a very early stage of the investigation.
“Almost immediately, experienced investigators within the joint counter-terrorism team believed that the caravan was part of a fabricated terrorist plot, essentially a … con job,” Barrett said.
So who did this?
Police allege the “con job” was fabricated by organised crime figures for personal benefit. It said these undisclosed figures were based in Australia and offshore.
Guardian Australia understands authorities believe there is one individual pulling the strings at the top of a chain of command, with a second layer below them of other individuals involved in organised crime, who are soliciting people to carry out acts.
Why would they do this?
The motivation is understood to be to distract police and divert their resources away from organised crime, as well as to create plots that incarcerated criminals can use to tip off law enforcement in order to reduce their sentences.
It is not clear why people further down the chain carried out acts on behalf of those orchestrating the plot.
What are politicians saying?
The New South Wales premier, Chris Minns, and his police minister, Yasmin Catley, said that despite the revelations the caravan plot was concocted, it had struck fear in the Jewish community.
The federal home affairs minister, Tony Burke, accused the Coalition opposition of politicising the government’s response. In a post on X, he said the opposition leader, Peter Dutton, had “played directly into the hands of organised crime figures who have been trying to profit from dividing our community”.
But the shadow home affairs minister, James Paterson, stood by the Coalition’s criticisms that the prime minister should have been briefed on the caravan at an earlier stage.
“Organised crime concocting terrorism plots targeting the Jewish community is an extremely serious matter,” Paterson said.
How have Jewish groups responded?
David Ossip, the president of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies, said confirmation the caravan incident was a “con job” should not in any way diminish the summer of fear and anxiety that the Jewish community experienced.
“The criminals who allegedly arranged and carried out these violent attacks sought to take advantage of already-strained social cohesion and unprecedented levels of antisemitism by targeting the Jewish community for their own personal benefit,” Ossip said. “This is reprehensible and had a chilling effect on the Jewish community.”