World Byte News

B.C. class-action lawsuit alleges Apple made false AI promises for iPhone 16​on March 30, 2025 at 1:00 pm

A Canada-wide class-action lawsuit has been launched in B.C. alleging Apple Canada engaged in misleading advertising when it marketed the iPhone 16, by promising it would include innovative artificial intelligence features that it did not have. Read More

​Proposed lawsuit alleges tech company made ‘misleading’ statements for new phone last fall about AI enhancements that it now says are in development, according to lawsuit filed in B.C. for buyers across Canada.   

Proposed lawsuit alleges tech company made ‘misleading’ statements for new phone last fall about AI enhancements that it now says are in development, according to lawsuit filed in B.C. for buyers across Canada.

Article content

A Canada-wide class-action lawsuit has been launched in B.C. alleging Apple Canada engaged in misleading advertising when it marketed the iPhone 16, by promising it would include innovative artificial intelligence features that it did not have.

Article content

Article content

The “pervasive” marketing campaign included “misrepresentations and/or misleading statements” that the iPhone 16 would be equipped with its new Apple Intelligence, to induce consumers into buying, according to the notice filed in B.C. Supreme Court.

Article content

Story continues below

Article content

“As such, consumers paid an unlawful price premium for the … iPhone 16 model smartphone that they did not need, based on artificial intelligence features that did not exist,” it alleged.

Article content

Article content

The suit names Apple Inc. and Apple Canada as defendants.

Article content

The proposed lawsuit alleges breach of contract, fraud, deceit, and unjust enrichment under provincial consumer protection laws and the federal Competition Act.

Article content

Apple, based in California, is “intimately familiar” with its consumer protection laws that “prohibit false advertising regarding the capabilities, availability and utility of AI products” there and elsewhere, the lawsuit said.

Article content

“In the race for AI market share, it decided to violate them anyway, misleading consumers into believing that the products possessed AI features, functions and benefits the products simply do not have and, according to company and industry insiders, may never have,” it says.

Article content

Story continues below

Article content

It also argued that if the AI features are added later, they will likely then be available everywhere and wouldn’t be unique or innovative. Also, as Apple releases new iPhone models, it would leave “consumers who bought into Apple’s false promises for the iPhone Model 16 series stuck with outdated technology for which they also overpaid.”

Article content

Stories You May Like

  1. Got an iPhone 6 or 7? You could get up to $150 as part of a class-action settlement

  2. North Vancouver hotel faces possible class-action lawsuit over ‘drip pricing’

  3. Advertisement embed-more-topic

    Story continues below

Article content

Travis Paivarinta, the representative plaintiff, bought an iPhone 16 Pro Max on March 5 from an Abbotsford Best Buy for $1,799, “believing that his new iPhone would contain the increased and enhanced AI capabilities that Apple repeatedly touted,” it said.

Article content

The lawsuit alleges that Apple’s website said the iPhone 16 offers “a new era for Siri” by having an “awareness of your personal context” to help you in ways that are unique to you, it said.

Article content

In much smaller fine print under that, its says: “Siri’s personal context understanding, onscreen awareness and in-app actions are in development and will be available with a future software update.”

 

Exit mobile version