The more than 20 people injured at the Lapu Lapu Day festival in Vancouver and relatives of the 11 people killed are limited in the compensation they can claim under B.C.’s no-fault car insurance program. Read More
Under no-fault, survivors and victims’ dependents can’t sue ICBC as the insurer of a driver’s vehicle, but they can sue the driver if he’s convicted of murder, among other crimes
Under no-fault, survivors and victims’ dependents can’t sue ICBC as the insurer of a driver’s vehicle, but they can sue the driver if he’s convicted of murder, among other crimes
Article content
The more than 20 people injured at the Lapu Lapu Day festival in Vancouver and relatives of the 11 people killed are limited in the compensation they can claim under B.C.’s no-fault car insurance program.
Article content
Article content
No-fault ended the right for the injured to sue at-fault drivers four years ago, unless the driver is convicted of certain criminal offences, including murder. If the driver ends up being convicted of murder, victims can then sue the driver, but not ICBC.
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
It’s unlikely the injured parties would be compensated for all losses in such a lawsuit, since the driver, not ICBC, would have to pay, according to Greg Phillips, a Vancouver personal injury lawyer and president of the Trial Lawyers Association of B.C. If a driver has no assets, the victims may go through a costly and time-consuming lawsuit only to be unable to collect, he said.
Article content
Sunrise
Article content
“Long story short, if the at-fault driver has no money, there is no recovery (of losses),” he said.
Article content
Kai-Ji Adam Lo was charged with eight counts of second-degree murder after someone drove an SUV into a crowd of people leaving at the end of the daylong festival at 41st Avenue and Fraser Street on April 26.
Article content
Eleven people between the ages five to 65 were killed and more than 20 others — moms, dads and at least two children, boys aged two and 11 — were injured in the massacre that stunned the province. Lo, 30, has been identified by health officials as someone being supervised under the Mental Health Act and is undergoing a psychiatric assessment while in custody.
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
If he’s not convicted or found not criminally responsible due to a mental disorder, the survivors and families of the deceased can’t sue for losses, even though ICBC insured the at-fault driver’s vehicle.
Article content
Read More
-
‘They have all the power’: Crash victims feel overwhelmed by ICBC’s no-fault insurance system
-
Motorcyclists almost killed on B.C. highway, then hit again by no-fault insurance: ‘It’s outrageous, but it’s the law’
-
Advertisement embed-more-topic
Story continues below
Article content
“No-fault means that victims have no right to sue and must accept whatever fixed benefits are set out in the legislation, regardless of the actual loss,” Phillips said in an email.
Article content
Other offences that can trigger a right to sue include manslaughter, dangerous operation of a vehicle and driving while impaired by alcohol or drugs, he said.
Article content
While a lawsuit against a convicted driver can include damages for pain and suffering, capped by Canadian courts at $400,000 for the worst of injuries, victims can expect nothing for additional punitive damages meant to punish an at-fault driver “because the courts tend to see the criminal sentence as punishment enough,” said Phillips.
Article content
Under the old system, families could have brought a claim under the Family Compensation Act for their actual losses, for example, what the loss of a parent would cost the child without the parent contributing to raising him, he said. That could include loss of financial support, loss of an eventual inheritance and the cost of providing child care and doing housework, as well the loss of guidance, care and companionship — all worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, he said.