World Byte News

Mentzelopoulos denies defaming Alberta premier’s former chief of staff in court filing

Lawyers representing the former head of Alberta Health Services (AHS) Athana Mentzelopoulos are denying claims of defamation by Premier Danielle Smith’s former chief of staff and call for his lawsuit to be dismissed in recently-filed court documents. Read More

​The former head of AHS denies defaming Marshall Smith and, in new court documents, calls for his $12-million lawsuit to be dismissed.   

The former head of AHS denies defaming Marshall Smith and, in new court documents, calls for his $12-million lawsuit to be dismissed.

Article content

Lawyers representing the former head of Alberta Health Services (AHS) Athana Mentzelopoulos are denying claims of defamation by Premier Danielle Smith’s former chief of staff and call for his lawsuit to be dismissed in recently-filed court documents.

Article content

Marshall Smith, who is unrelated to the premier, filed a $12-million lawsuit in May against Mentzelopoulos, the Globe and Mail newspaper along with one of its reporters, and another person whose identity is unknown to him but believed to be a former AHS board member.

Article content

Article content

Story continues below

Article content

Smith alleges statements in Mentzelopoulos’s $1.7-million wrongful dismissal suit, along with further court filings and subsequent media reporting, defamed him and resulted in emotional distress, stress, depression, anxiety, embarrassment, loss of reputation, humiliation and an inability to secure work in his chosen profession.

Article content

Article content

Mentzelopoulos’s lawyers filed a statement of defence in Court of King’s Bench in Edmonton last Wednesday that denies Smith’s claims in their entirety.

Article content

“Mentzelopoulos denies each and every allegation set forth in the plaintiff Marshall Smith’s statement of claim,” it states.

Article content

“He is not entitled to any damages or any relief whatsoever from Ms. Mentzelopoulos. Ms. Mentzelopoulos did not defame Mr. Smith and did not cause him loss or damages.”

Article content

Her lawyers further argue that allegations contained in her court filings are protected by legal privilege and therefore are immune from legal attack.

Article content

Story continues below

Article content

“Ms. Mentzelopoulos has an entitlement to state the facts that gave rise to her current circumstances.”

Article content

The statement also denies Smith suffered any damages as a result of Mentzelopoulos, and even if that were the case, “the damages claimed are grossly excessive, exaggerated, and not warranted in the circumstances.”

Article content

It goes on to refute 13 specific allegations Smith makes in his statement of claim, and seeks to have his lawsuit against her dismissed with costs.

Article content

“Her statements in the pleadings in her action are statements of fact, they were true or substantially true in substance and fact, and, to the extent any of her statements are statements of opinion, they constituted fair comment,” her statement reads.

Article content

She also claims to have no knowledge of the individual Smith purports to be a former AHS board member who he also believes to have defamed him.

 

Exit mobile version