Against the backdrop of Donald Trump’s threat to Canada’s future, the prime minister is embarking on a nation-building project rivalling Sir John A. Macdonald’s National Policy. Read More
Against the backdrop of Donald Trump’s threat to Canada’s future, the prime minister is embarking on a nation-building project rivalling Sir John A. Macdonald’s National Policy. The mantra is “build, baby, build” with Bill C-5 the midwife of this plan. The haste with which this legislation was rushed through Parliament is troubling many, as was
Article content
Against the backdrop of Donald Trump’s threat to Canada’s future, the prime minister is embarking on a nation-building project rivalling Sir John A. Macdonald’s National Policy.
Article content
The mantra is “build, baby, build” with Bill C-5 the midwife of this plan. The haste with which this legislation was rushed through Parliament is troubling many, as was the Trump-like urgency behind getting an agreement on internal trade by Canada Day.
Article content
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
There’s no question that Mark Carney has a lot of political capital to spend and he has to exploit the honeymoon afterglow. It is also true that the logic of his actions is sound: Canada has been far too dependent on trade with the Americans — an understandable strategy if a multibillion-dollar market sits on your doorstep.
Article content
Article content
Headline News
Article content
With that market disappearing, moves to find others in Europe and beyond are necessary, as are plans to forge a closer relationship with the European Union. However, embedding the ability to bypass pesky regulations and perhaps limit public consultations to accelerate construction of major projects, does not inspire confidence. Legitimate concerns have been expressed by, among others, Indigenous and environmental groups, who feel that their voices will be muted, if not silenced.
Article content
The cost of living and the housing shortage dominated the recent federal election, easing out issues like climate change, health care, et cetera. Here again, not surprising, since having a roof over one’s head must take precedence over everything else. Building housing at breakneck speed is one thing, but fast-tracking mega-projects is something else entirely. Is it wise to put the environment on the back burner when evidence of a warming planet smacks us in the face every summer? And is there not a danger that Indigenous interests may be sidelined in pursuit of a new National Policy? RIP Reconciliation?
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
The duty to consult Indigenous groups has been affirmed and clarified by various Supreme Court decisions and Canada’s ratification of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. The latter obliges the federal government to uphold the principle of “free, prior and informed consent” of Indigenous groups before resource-development projects affecting their lands can proceed.
Article content
It is important to point out that Aboriginal groups have a very different attitude to decision-making. They do not make important decisions lightly. They consider their impact far into the future to determine how the seventh generation will be affected. While this might seem excessive to Settler society, one would hope that we would, at the very least, consider the repercussions of our actions on our grandchildren.
Article content
In fact, we could learn much from Indigenous values and attitudes to resources, especially with respect to water. Aboriginal groups do not frame the discussion in terms of their rights to water — rather, the focus is on their obligations to it. While Settlers believe they have dominion over the earth, Indigenous people adhere to an ethic of responsibility when interacting with water and other resources. They consider themselves stewards of nature’s bounty obliged to protect and preserve it for future generations.