I am set to retire in December, but am rethinking my decision. Read MoreA public servant with “one foot out the door” worries that retiring before buyouts come into effect might cost them thousands of dollars a year.
A public servant with “one foot out the door” worries that retiring before buyouts come into effect might cost them thousands of dollars a year.

Article content
| Dear Public Service Confidential,
I am set to retire in December, but am rethinking my decision. I am in group two and if I retire in December, I will face a permanent deduction of almost 20 per cent. That represents thousands of dollars per year for the rest of my life. I’m sure Parliament will approve the budget, but I’m unsure how long it will take for my department to start offering immediate annuities with no penalty for people in group two. What is your understanding of how the early retirement incentive will be rolled out and what would the timelines look like? And will it be up to department heads to determine if they want to offer early retirement or not? I’m already one foot out the door so I don’t want to drag this out. I also don’t want to lose thousands of dollars a year for the rest of my life. Sincerely, |
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
Article content
Article content
| Thank you for your question. It’s a timely one that many are asking now.
The Department of Finance has stated the process of implementing the budget, which was unveiled on Nov. 4, will start Jan. 15, 2026, or when the bill receives royal assent. So, I think realistically, we should expect the implementation of its early retirement incentives for public servants to get going in earnest in late January or early February. The program is then scheduled to conclude after one year. The criterion for eligibility is straight forward in each of the two groups, depending of course, on when you started in the public service and your age. Group one includes employees who started their careers before 2013 and those in group two were hired after. The government of former prime minister Stephen Harper created a two-tiered system that raised the retirement age of public servants in group two to 65. The new incentive well allow public servants in group one who are over the age of 50, or over the age of 55 if they are in group two, have 10 years of employment and at least two years of pensionable service, to retire early with no penalty. What isn’t clear right now is how this will be rolled out across the various departments and agencies. I would think the decision to implement the incentive in any given department or agency will be made by the deputy head. The rules of the game are not fully known yet, but “additional parameters” are expected to be set by the Treasury Board. The big question is whether those parameters will exclude any departments or agencies. I would be very surprised to hear if this incentive would be offered widely across the Department of Defence or the Canada Border Services Agency, which are only being asked to cut their operational budgets by 2 per cent over three years. But we should expect to see it offered across the Canada Revenue Agency and Employment Social Development Canada, large organizations which have been asked to find up to 15 per cent in savings over that same period. When the federal public service went through major cuts in the 1990’s under then-prime minister Jean Chrétien’s government, there were departments identified as most affected departments (MAD), and LAD, less affected departments (LAD). Employees in a MAD were allowed to transfer to a LAD but the reverse was not allowed. The Treasury Board will likely have a similar system for this time. DND has already set up a program called Pathway to Mobility to hire thousands of public servants this year. The early retirement incentive will be attractive for any employee who may have been thinking of leaving or anyone with a potential second career. For employees who were already planning on retiring from the public service with a penalty, it might be wise to wait until all the details are known. When you retire with a penalty of 5 per cent per year, that can quickly add up. However, at this point it isn’t a sure thing you’ll be offered this incentive and the department or agency you work for might affect your decision. The specific duties you perform may also impact it. I doubt this will be a blanket application to all employees. Those wanting to take advantage of the incentive will have to weigh their own individual circumstances. Some factors to consider include your final pension amount, (there may not be a penalty, but that doesn’t mean the final amount is what you expected), potential advancement if you stay (this could have very significant impact on your pension amount), and duties currently performed (potential further cuts). Any initiative in the face of cuts that reduces the number of involuntary layoffs and increases voluntary departures should be applauded. As with most government announcements, the devil will be in the details and it will be interesting to see how this is implemented across the public service. On a closing note, the Department of Finance suggested that employees could contact the Pension Centre (which is run by Public Services and Procurement Canada or PSPC) for more information. I doubt Finance gave PSPC any additional resources to handle the influx of calls. If you are calling the Pension Centre please remember they are probably overwhelmed with calls since this announcement was made, and patience would go a long way. — Chris Aylward, Public Service Confidential |
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
Article content
Chris Aylward was elected as the national president of the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) in 2018, and was re-elected in 2022. Born and raised in Newfoundland, Chris has been an active PSAC member and an employee of the Canada Revenue Agency for 42 years. His involvement in the labour movement started when he became a shop steward with the Union of Taxation Employees — a component of PSAC, at the St. John’s Taxation Centre.
Article content
Article content
Read More
-
The government won’t achieve public service cuts through attrition alone
-
How public service executives can lead through times of austerity
-
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
Article content
Are you a public servant with questions about your workplace? Write to us anonymously at PSConfidential@postmedia.com and we’ll pick our favourites to send to an expert columnist. No gripe is too small. No topic is too big.
Article content
Public Service Confidential is an advice column, written for the Ottawa Citizen by guest contributors Scott Taymun, Yazmine Laroche, Daniel Quan-Watson, V. C. de la Ronde and Chris Aylward. The information provided in this series is not legal advice and should not be construed as legal advice.
Article content
Article content