Six of the nine mayoral candidates faced off in a debate Wednesday evening — and when asked who they would vote for other than themselves, most of them named Jaeger Gustafson, notably not one of the perceived frontrunners in the mayoral race. Read More
A relatively amicable debate touched on hot-button issues such as public safety and keeping up with the city’s rapid growth and aging infrastructure
A relatively amicable debate touched on hot-button issues such as public safety and keeping up with the city’s rapid growth and aging infrastructure

Article content
Six of the nine mayoral candidates faced off in a debate Wednesday evening — and when asked who they would vote for other than themselves, most of them named Jaeger Gustafson, notably not one of the perceived frontrunners in the mayoral race.
Article content
“I would say that if you want some of the wildest ideas that could work, it’s got to be Jaeger,” incumbent mayor Jyoti Gondek said.
Article content
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
Addressing Gustafson, Gondek said, “You’re actually a thoughtful person, so thanks for bringing some levity and some interesting ideas.”
Article content
Article content
Sonya Sharp, Jeromy Farkas and Jeff Davison each echoed the sentiment.
Article content
“He’s got awesome ideas,” Davison said.
Article content
Gustafson himself said he’d vote for Brian Thiessen, “because he’s a lawyer.”
Article content
“I think some people gotta go to jail,” Gustafson said.
Article content
Article content
Sarah Elder, a first-time candidate, took a pass on answering the question.
Article content
“I actually got into this race for this exact reason — just because I felt like I couldn’t vote for any of these people,” she said.
Article content
Candidates advocate for infrastructure
Article content
The question followed a relatively amicable debate that touched on hot-button issues such as public safety and keeping up with the city’s rapid growth and aging infrastructure.
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
“We’re about 10 years behind on our infrastructure when it comes to Calgary,” Sharp said, arguing for a “fix-it-first” mentality.
Article content
Read More
Article content
“We need to fix what we have before we can start throwing money at things,” she said. “There is a lack of infrastructure for this city, and we know it’s growing.”
Article content
Farkas argued there needs to be a budget for both updating existing infrastructure and new projects.
Article content
“We’ve got to walk and chew bubblegum at the same time,” he said, noting there’s been too much focus on the bigger projects.
Article content
“It’s not just these big facilities,” he said. “It’s got to be the important local, street-level stuff that matters to communities.”
Article content
Elder advocated for a focus on community amenities, while Davison plans to look for ways to offset the operational costs of infrastructure such as recreation facilities and transit.
Article content
Article content
For Gondek, partnerships with the private sector and more use of technology are the solutions to keeping the cost of infrastructure down.
Article content
“If we can detect that pavement is going to fail before it does, then let’s do the repair at a lesser cost and preserve those roads for longer,” she said. “Those are the types of initiatives that we have been implementing.”
Article content