The water quality of urban beaches improved this summer, but some locals worry there’s still too much pollution. See how the beaches near you rate.
The water quality of urban beaches improved this summer, but some locals worry there’s still too much pollution. See how the beaches near you rate.
By Lachlan Abbott
February 22, 2025 — 12.35pm
Melbourne’s cleanest and dirtiest beaches have been revealed in the latest water quality data, which shows while things have improved overall, inner-city swimming spots remain the most polluted.
The Environment Protection Authority (EPA) rated the water quality at 36 beaches around the bay as “good” more often between Christmas and February 14 than in the same period a year earlier.
EPA data provided to The Age revealed the cleanest beach forecasts were at Portsea and Queenscliff, which were rated as “good” 89 per cent of the time. St Kilda remained the worst testing spot, recording a good rating in 55 per cent of tests.
The biggest improvement was at Sandridge, near the mouth of the Yarra River, where the rating was good 70 per cent of the time – more than double the 34 per cent recorded in the 2023-24 summer.
Overall, the forecasts for Port Phillip Bay beaches from the start of December until mid-February were 70 per cent good, 19 per cent fair and 11 per cent poor.
But some environmental activists believe the health of urban waterways feeding into the bay is still unacceptably bad.
In Melbourne’s bayside suburbs, the Elwood Canal Action Team wants Melbourne Water to draft a new masterplan for the Elster Creek catchment – a 41-square-kilometre zone largely in the Glen Eira council area.
The group claims too much rubbish has built up in downstream parts of the canal and that toxicity is “off the charts”.
Advertisement
The EPA’s forecasts show the lowest-ranked beaches were close to river mouths or large drains, making them more susceptible to stormwater pollution.
Loading
Sally Gibson, a spokesperson for the activists, argues the EPA beach tests – which graded Elwood beach as good 64 per cent of the time this summer – should also include microplastics and chemicals.
Gibson shared privately conducted water and sediment tests from near the mouth of Elwood canal, taken in March last year, that appeared to show elevated levels of trace metals and chemicals like mercury.
“When I saw these results, I couldn’t believe it,” she said. “I’ve lived nearby for 38 years, and I’m now thinking, ‘Oh my God, that is a real sewer.’”
But Oliver Jones, a professor of chemistry at RMIT University, who disclosed he had received research funding from Melbourne Water previously, examined the private test results and cautioned that they did not necessarily indicate a health risk, as human exposure was limited.
“If you’ve got soil in your back garden, it’s quite different to sediment sitting at the bottom of a stream. They’re not eating the sediment or growing vegetables in it,” he said.
“It looks what you pretty much expect from a highly urbanised creek’s sediment and water, particularly one at the bottom end of the catchment, [where] it’s got everything coming from upstream through it.
“Obviously, you can always do better, but you never get a perfectly pristine stream when you’ve got people living around it.”
The Elwood Canal Action Team also claimed that Melbourne Water was not doing enough to remove rubbish. The group regularly walks down the canal’s concrete embankments to scoop up plastic.
John Woodland, the head of south-eastern waterway and catchment services at Melbourne Water, said the organisation had worked with Glen Eira Council to employ a litter officer to consult the community and “implement a whole of catchment action plan for Elster Creek”.
“Melbourne Water currently invests more resources in litter management around Elster Creek than any other location in Melbourne,” he said.
“Through regular contact with the Elwood community group, we are now doubling our litter clean-ups, with our teams removing litter and debris weekly. There are already two litter traps in Elwood Canal, and we are preparing to install a new floating litter boom later this year.
“We all have a part to play to keep our creeks healthy and safe. Whilst we’re taking action to clean up the creek, the litter that ends up in our waterways ultimately comes from the streets.”
Mark Taylor, the EPA’s chief environmental scientist, said drier weather had broadly improved the bay’s water quality this year, as less rain meant reduced stormwater run-off from in-land and urban areas. That limited the prevalence of pollutants such as animal faeces around beaches, he said.
“Fluctuations in water quality are driven by natural processes and enhanced by humanity,” Taylor said.
“Cities where they’ve got beaches on their edges, you’re always going to be in a situation where, after rain events, you will have pollutants flushed through the system and out into the ocean.”
While he “wouldn’t fancy swimming in the Yarra” and suggested beachgoers monitor the EPA’s forecasts, Taylor said the bay remained largely safe, as more polluted urban waterways diluted upon entering the ocean.
“Use your common sense, but the water quality in the bay, much of the time, is more than adequate for swimming,” he said.
“So go and enjoy it. We’re lucky to have that. The access to the city is incredible.”
Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.
Discover more from World Byte News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.