After a lengthy discussion, the City of Ottawa’s election compliance audit committee voted Tuesday afternoon not to prosecute Capital ward Coun. Shawn Menard for failing to accurately report campaign finances by $310.98. Read MoreAn independent audit by OXARO found that Menard understated his 2022 campaign expenses, but was still under the Municipal Elections Act limit.
An independent audit by OXARO found that Menard understated his 2022 campaign expenses, but was still under the Municipal Elections Act limit.

Article content
After a lengthy discussion, the City of Ottawa’s election compliance audit committee voted Tuesday afternoon not to prosecute Capital ward Coun. Shawn Menard for failing to accurately report campaign finances by $310.98.
Article content
Committee chair Timothy Cullen said the committee agreed with the auditor’s conclusion, which stated there was an apparent violation of the Municipal Elections Act.
Article content
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
However, Cullen said Menard’s campaign expenses were within the spending limit set out in the Municipal Elections Act, which the audit report also noted.
Article content
Article content
“In the particular circumstances before us, the committee considers the apparent violation to be de minimis (too small to be considered) and that commencing legal proceedings is not warranted … The dollar amount, $310.98, is fairly low,” Cullen said.
Article content
“The under-reporting did not result in Mr. Menard exceeding the maximum contribution limit for a candidate and/or spouse.”
Article content
The committee’s decision came after an independent audit by OXARO found that Menard had understated his election-sign expenses for the 2022 campaign.
Article content
According to the report, the amount recorded in Menard’s campaign financial statements was “inaccurate and is an apparent non-compliance” of the Municipal Elections Act because he did not adequately report that he reused leftover materials from 2018.
Article content
Story continues below
Article content
The audit found Menard filed $1,412.50 for election expenses for 250 small signs from the 2018 campaign when he should have filed $1,723.48 for 240 small signs and 10 large signs, a difference of $310.98.
Article content
Read More
-
Hospital workers rally against Ottawa’s proposed ‘bubble zone bylaw’
-
Doug Ford’s vow to ban research on dogs will have chilling impact: Carleton researcher
-
Advertisement embed-more-topic
Story continues below
Article content
However, despite that irregularity, the auditors said, Menard did not exceed the Municipal Elections Act spending limits. According to Menard’s campaign filing, he spent $27,199.10, and the recalculation increased that to $27,508.90.
Article content
Municipal election candidates are permitted to reuse leftover materials such as campaign signs or office supplies, but they must establish current market value for those materials based on what it would cost to purchase them again, and that current market value must be filed as a campaign expense.
Article content
The OXARO report also noted this was the only inaccuracy in Menard’s campaign financial statement. It did not recommend any penalties because that was the committee’s responsibility.
Discover more from World Byte News
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


